Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Benchmark Six Sigma Forum

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Topics

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 02/03/2023 in all areas

  1. Shainin RED X projects are evidence-based; converging on the main source of variation, the emphasizing principle is DY = f(Dx)The largest value will result from a combination of a significant coefficient and a large change in X. What is the difference between Shainin and Six Sigma? The main difference between the Shainin Red X® approach (FACTUAL) and the Six Sigma methodology (DMAIC) is the phase Approach. The Red X develops a strategy based upon the physics of the problem and the comparison of the BOB (Best of Best) and WOW (Worst of Worst) parts Any problem-solving methodology involves two phases’ diagnostic and remedial phases. The diagnostic phase is concerned with measuring and analyzing the current process performance while the remedial phase involves of various corrective actions taken to improve the process and monitoring the new process to make it a culture. Tables show the comparison between the six sigma and Shainin methodological approaches. The basis for Comparison Six Sigma Red X Meaning Six sigma methodology attempts to improve the existing process The Shainin System™ (SS) is defined as a problem-solving system designed for medium- to high-volume processes where this methodology follows FACTUAL approach. Focuses on - Process Focused Red X statistical engineering identifies a set of tools first used to identify the Red X, and then to monitor the effectiveness of controlling the Red X. Shainin system focuses on understanding the machine or parts problem and assembly operations facilities Methodology Six Sigma uses DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analysis, Improve, control) Red X approach uses the following structure, called FACTUAL (Focus, Approach, Converge, Test, understand, Apply, Leverage Domain Knowledge No Deep understanding is required of the Y & the problem You must have a deep understanding of the Y and the problem. Tools used Descriptive statistics. Regression analysis, designed experiments, hypothesis tests, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and control charts. Shainin systems are such as Isoplot, Multi-Vari analysis, Concentration Chart, Component search, Paired comparison, Product/Process search, Variable search, Full factorial, B versus C, etc Skill Six sigma required strong statistical & analytical knowledge RED x requires good technical knowledge, engineering skills, common sense, and simple statistics to solve technical problems with statistical confidence
  2. The Shainin X methodology is described as a system for resolving issues created for medium- to high-volume processes where data are easily accessible, statistical techniques are frequently employed, and process intervention is challenging. It has mostly been used in facilities for part and assembly processes. The basic principality of the Red X technique is that there is always a dominant cause of variation. This claim is supported by the Pareto principle's application to the causes of the variance. Usually, changes in a number of inputs lead to changes in the output. These inputs (Xs) are divided into groups based on color, with the Red X serving as the primary cause. The GreenY state is how Shainin describes the desirable state of the output. Using Shainin tools has the benefit of requiring very low sample sets for problem analysis. Frequently, samples of just two or three are sufficient to draw statistically significant results. The data can be analyzed without the use of computerized statistical methods. Moreover underlying causes are identified through "interacting to the parts" as opposed to assumptions or preconceived notions. Due to the statistically robustness of the procedures, main effects and interaction effects were distinguished and quantified. A great variety of versatility is offered by the 12 various approaches. It is simpler to incorporate the entire workforce because the strategies are simple to implement and inexpensive to learn. The below four groups can be used to group the 12 techniques: Generation Clue: Until the fundamental cause can be isolated, quasi causes of variation are removed using the multi-vari analysis filtering technique. Pictograph: Used to indicate where a flaw is located on a component, in a design, or on a grid. Either a random pattern or a concentration in a specific location will result (s). Components Search: To identify the source of the issue, parts and sub-assemblies are switched between good and problematic products. -Comparing the greatest and worst product examples side by side will help you identify the traits or factors that set the best and worst goods apart. List and quantify the process variables in the product/process search -Search for Products/Processes: The process variables that affect a product's quality should be listed and measured. By contrasting data from a process that yields good parts with measurements from a process that yields faulty parts, you can identify which of these process factors is to blame for the problem. DOE optimization By displaying one variable against the other, a scatterplot (also known as a scatter diagram) can be used to visually depict the relationship between two variables. RSM, or Response Surface Methodology When we want to improve the settings of the essential elements in a process once they have been isolated, we apply a DOE technique. When we are aware of or believe that the response variable has curvature (i.e., non-linearity), we use RSM designs. DOE approach Variables Search: A grid search approach that distinguishes between significant and minor process variables through testing the optimal and limiting values for each variable Complete factor analyses: These tests cover all possible combinations of variables, and all of their interconnections, and work best when there are just a few variables that have a big effect on the answer variable. They take longer and cost more to execute than screening methods. B vs. C: B stands for the superior or improved method, whilst C stands for the existing process. Six samples—three B samples and three C samples—are used in the test. According to the Law of Combinations, there is simply one possibility in 20 that all three Bs will outrank all three Cs, providing us 95% certainty that this is not a coincidence. Positrol (or precontrol): Items are rated as red, yellow, or green depending on how closely they adhere to the standard or tolerance. Green represents the tolerance's middle portion; yellow represents its second half; and red represents the tolerance's upper limit. How frequently the process requires change determines the sampling frequency. Continue running if a specimen is green. Choose another sample if the first one is yellow. Stop the process and tweak or modify it if the second piece is yellow. If any of the samples are red, halt the procedure and make any necessary adjustments. The Process Certification (Process Control, and Management Plan) specifies the who, how, where, and when of controls that will guarantee that the significant variables or factors are kept under control.
This leaderboard is set to Kolkata/GMT+05:30

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.