Jump to content


Popular Content

Showing most liked content since 02/13/2018 in all areas

  1. 1 point
    Q 76. Some of the commonly used measures of customer satisfaction are given below - NPS (Net Promoter Score) - Loyalty and referral check. C-SAT (Customer Satisfaction Index) - Satisfaction attained by the use of product/service. Churn (Customer Churn Rate) - Customer loss assessment. CAC (Customer Acquisition Cost) - CAC is all the costs spent on acquiring more customers (marketing expenses) divided by the number of customers acquired in the period the money was spent. CES (Customer Effort Score) - Customer effort assessment in getting work done/ issues resolved. What will be your ranking for the five metrics (NPS, C-SAT, Churn, CAC, CES) as per order of importance for Performance of a call center for credit card support services and why? This question is a part of Excellence Ambassador initiative and is open for 3 days. There is a reward of 2000 points for best answer in 3 days. All rewards are mentioned here - https://www.benchmarksixsigma.com/forum/excellence-ambassador-rewards/. The scoreboard is here - https://www.benchmarksixsigma.com/forum/business-excellence-scoreboard/ All questions so far can be seen here - https://www.benchmarksixsigma.com/forum/lean-six-sigma-business-excellence-questions/
  2. 1 point
    SJ has explained this in detail. Two more lines to summarise - In a two sided specification limit, Cpk multiplied by three is the smaller of the two sigma levels (sigma level upper and sigma level lower) In the example above Cpk = 1 and Cpk multiplied by three is Sigma Leval (Upper).
  3. 1 point
    Dear Ari/Ramabadran, You have rightly pointed out the Cpk cannot be translated directly into Sigma levels. Here are some additional points regarding that topic. Cpk (unlike Cp) includes both variation and shift to calculate the process capability. The traditional formula for Cpk (for a normally distributed process data) is given by: Cpk = min [ (USL - Xbar)/(3*S), (Xbar - LSL)/(3*S)] Where, LSL and USL are the Lower and Upper Specification Limits (as determined from the customer), Xbar is the average of the process data, and S is the sample standard deviation. When, we look at the formula, we see that we compute the minimum. Which means, we are looking at the defects that are greater than USL on one side and the defects that are less than the LSL on the other side and only picking the worst case (A smaller process capability number relates to larger number of defects). So, if a process had 10,000 PPM defects to the left of LSL and 20,000 PPM defects to the right of USL, then Cpk will look at both of them and then compute the process capability number related to 20,000. As pointed out earlier, Sigma Level (Bench) looks at defects on both sides and adds them up. So, it would not be directly possible to translate Cpk numbers to Sigma Levels. However, assuming the worst case defects occurs on both sides, it would be possible to estimate a conservative estimate of Sigma level if we so desire. Example: Let's say LSL = 11.5, USL = 18, Xbar = 15, S = 1. Cpk = min[(18-15)/(3*1), (15-11.5)/(3*1)] = min[1, 1.167] = 1.0 CpU (only looking at USL) = 1.0 CpL (only looking at LSL) = 1.167 PPM_U (only looking at USL) = 1350 PPM_L (only looking at LSL) = 232 PPM_Total (both sides) = 1582 Sigma_U = 3.0 Sigma_L = 3.5 Sigma_Bench = 2.95 Conservative estimate for Sigma_Bench based on Cpk = 1.0 (assume both sides have PPM = 1350 - centered process!). Hence, Total PPM = 2700 => Sigma_Bench = 2.78. CONCLUSION: Cp * 3 gives you sigma level on one side (Z_LSL and Z_USL). Cpk cannot be directly translated into sigma level for bilateral tolerances as it only looks at the worst side. Of course, if it is a unilateral tolerance, then we can predict Sigma levels from Cpk numbers.
This leaderboard is set to Kolkata/GMT+05:30