Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Benchmark Six Sigma Forum

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Topics

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 09/20/2017 in all areas

  1. A false alarm, occasionally maybe okay or one may never want it similarly a missed alert may not be acceptable or sometimes it can be lived with. Too many false alarms can lead to unwarranted changes in a perfectly stable process and might lead to defects being produced at a later time, and at the same time missed alert means that the defective product will reach the customer which would have business impacts. In statistical terms, one can say that a false alarm is like a Type I error, and a missed alert is like a Type II error. As in the case of type I and type II errors, it largely depends on the consequences of these alarms which would help one decide which is more critical. Personally I would prefer a false alarm over a missed alert, as a false alarm will give opportunity to the operator / process engineer to study the cause of the alarm and then only he would take action on the process, however a missed alert passes on the fault to the next step, and the chances of the defect reaching the customer is high. Thanks Jisha Nair
  2. Background and Concept: False Alarm and Missed Alert are better understood with the two types of errors that are possible in statistical Hypothesis testing. Dealing with them with reference to test of hypotheses will provide more insights than otherwise. Any hypothesis test is begun with the assumption that the null hypothesis is correct. Null hypothesis is the default position and corresponds to the idea that "one is innocent until proven guilty". False alarm or Type I errors or False Positives (α): They happen when we reject a true null hypothesis. Missed alert or Type II errors or False Negatives (β): They happen when we accept (fail to reject) a false null hypothesis. Which error will you prefer over the other? The answer to this question depends on the problem and the worst that could happen if either a Type1 or Type 2 error was committed. Example 1: Person accused of Murder awaiting Death Sentence. Null Hypothesis: Person did not commit murder. Type 1 error: Person did not commit murder but pronounced guilty. (Rejected true Null Hypothesis) Type 2 error: Person committed murder but pronounce Not guilty. (Accepted false Null Hypothesis) In this example, though Type 2 error is not favorable to society, but hanging an innocent person is far worse. So Type2 error or a Missed alert is preferable. Example 2: Person being screened for a disease to prescribe further tests. Null Hypothesis: Person does not have the disease. Type 1 error: Person does not have the disease but recommended for further tests. (Rejected true Null Hypothesis) Type 2 error: Person has the disease but recommended for no further tests. (Accepted false Null Hypothesis) In this example, Type 1 error might cause the patient to undergo further tests but might finally reveal that he does not have the disease. A type 2 error would prevent a legitimate patient from undergoing further tests. But a legitimate patient can re-do the test if the symptoms persist, and it is fine for a person to do some further tests even if he does not have the disease. So Type1 error or False alarm is preferable. Example 3: Person being screened for a disease (presence of which has a good rate of survival and normal life) to prescribe a delicate specialised surgery that has poor success rate. Null Hypothesis: Person does not have the disease. Type 1 error: Person does not have the disease but recommended for surgery. (Rejected true Null Hypothesis) Type 2 error: Person has the disease but not recommended for surgery. (Accepted false Null Hypothesis) In this example, Type 2 error might cause the legitimate patient to not have the surgery which is bad, but it is much worse to have a person without the disease undergo the delicate critical surgery. The legitimate patient may re-do the tests, if he still feels the symptoms of the disease and may be re-diagnosed to undergo the surgery. In this case, a Type2 error or a Missed alert is preferable.
  3. 1 point
    Takt Time Concept - Takt is a German word, It describes the conductors baton (for example in music orchestra). It is the concept that all activity within a business is synchronized by a rhythm, set by the customer demand. To simplify this concept, auto-industry, where mass production is done in ‘pull’ manner, has generally described it as “Time Available to Complete Task (Task here means production of one unit e.g a car). An organization may decide and make suitable arrangements to produce a unit (product/service) in Takt-time or slightly less than Takt-time, repetitively in a cyclic manner, this speed at which production is done to ensure org meets the customer requirement is called Cycle Time. And total production time from start to end is called Lead Time. To calculate the 'Takt time', following formula is used, Takt = 'Production Time Available' / 'Customer Demand'. 'Production time Available' is derived by deducting the Lunch and tea breaks, Team briefing times, TPM breaks, Clean down time, etc from 'total available time', as per industry practices. Hence 'Takt' is in fact the goal or target rate. Takt & 'Resource planning' is closely related - As demand may fluctuate, a takt time can be then calculated for anticipated demand (or known demand) to plan resource levels. This applies across the board for any production operation, as well as Lean operations. Why Takt is important & decisions it affects/drives- Takt Time regulates following, 1. The pulse of the Production System, and so the resources required ! 2. Rate of fulfillment of customer demand or Pace of sales !! 3. Links production activity to actual customer demand !!! 4. Ensures all production activity will be synchronized from 1st process to final assembly process, which is nothing but the balance flow. Takt time concept helps to set the flow of production. Work balancing is done to match to takt (by applying lean tools & practices) and so the flow of production is in tune with customer needs. Hence Takt is enabler for work balance in the business. Successful Takt planning drives the business decisions which are strategic as well as tactical in nature. Takt drives organization to meet the strategic objectives of business, for example - Customer Satisfaction, Profits, Investment decisions, ROI, ROCE, Payback, Market Share and Growth. Also effective takt planning drives org to meet operational level objectives (Tactical), for example - Effective use of its people and plants, inventories, cashflow, productivity and various costs. Whole SCM related decisions are driven by takt planning decisions. Calculations/Decisions on Takt eventually drives/affects the decision on Technology selection, Equipment selection decisions, Capital Investment, Operations cost, Offloading decisions / in-house production, Manpower & skills decisions, etc. Also, Identifying the areas of under-performance or waste in the system is the total focus of Lean and there Takt plays a vital role & becomes driver of improvement efforts. - Written by Vivek Dahake, based on experience in Auto-mfg-industry.
  4. I observed that the scope of six sigma has increased it is now applicable in many industrial sectors. When Bill Smith created this methodology his main focus was defect reduction and improvement which brings excellence and process improvement, later on Quality formed the core of other methodology/framework too. I have seen that the approach of employees toward quality management has not yet changed, they still consider this as the job of quality unit, as for them quality means compliance, reporting, QMS manual and most importantly Audits. I found that organizations are spending good amount of money in quality related training/workshops/paperwork etc. but still are not successful in changing the approach of individuals. At high level, every organization’s policy talks about quality and its importance but at ground level due to fixed processes, departmentalized structure it become a task of small number of people, like managers and specifically of those who belongs to quality department, since it’s their job. Induction program- By definition an induction program is an important process for bringing staff into an organization. It provides an introduction to the working environment and the set-up of the employee within the organization. An induction program is part of an organizations knowledge management process and is intended to enable the new starter to become a useful, integrated member of the team. But I believe now organizations have a need to adopt a new approach of induction program: Organizations should provide Process Excellence/Quality training to each and every employee at the time of induction, this training they can design as per the requirements of their LOB (Line of Business). Also when induction of an employee gets conducted at that time we can tell employee that they are suppose to share their views (positive or negative) after six months from now about quality of process/operation to which they belongs (preferably through a presentation) so that this training of quality not become just a training and they feel involved with the things they have learned. This kind of treatment at induction will make employee responsible for his own quality as well as quality of his team and organization. Why this should be done at induction program because when we start with induction: 1. The new employee will feel himself linked with the quality department. 2. This will make new employee feel that he is responsible for the quality of operation to which he belongs. 3. This will convey a message to employee that organization has a serious approach towards quality. This approach will bring mutual benefits and this also links with the high level objective of each and every organization that is “alignment of individual objectives with organization’s objectiveâ€. Now the question comes since induction is for new employee what will happen to those who are already working? For this we need not to do anything but to ask them to attend this “Quality session†which we are conducting for new employees and they can join this from there and then. I believe that each and every individual should feel himself responsible for quality and there is a need to make quality a routine habit rather than an event.
This leaderboard is set to Kolkata/GMT+05:30

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.