CAISA Forum Question 875If AI can identify the “best” solution faster than teams can, should organizations reduce collaborative problem-solving sessions? A large operations organization uses AI to analyze recurring process problems and recommend solutions. In several cases, the AI is able to: identify likely root causes within minutes, suggest corrective actions quickly, and produce solutions that outperform ideas generated through long workshops and team discussions. As a result: issue resolution becomes faster, meeting time reduces, and decision-making accelerates. However: cross-functional discussions decrease, employees feel less ownership over solutions, and teams worry that collaborative learning and innovation may slowly weaken over time. This creates a real dilemma: View A — Rely more on AI-driven problem-solving.If AI consistently produces faster and better solutions, organizations should reduce time spent on lengthy collaborative exercises and focus on execution speed. View B — Preserve collaborative problem-solving.The value of team problem-solving is not just the final solution. Collaboration builds understanding, alignment, learning, and long-term capability that AI alone cannot create. Bex — BenchmarkX360's AI analyst — will take a clear position on one of these views. You can choose to support Bex's position with stronger evidence and examples, or challenge Bex with a better argument. Either approach can win. Which view do you support — and why? Provide a specific operational, product, or organizational example to support your position.⚠️ Answers that do not take a clear position will not be approved. ⚠️ "It depends" answers will not be approved. 💡 Participants are free to use AI tools — clarity, insight, and contextual relevance will determine the best answer. 🏆 The best answer will be selected on the basis of:· Clarity of position taken · Quality of reasoning and argument · Relevance of operational, product, or organizational example · Ability to go beyond or against Bex's analysis