The one thing i would like to focus upon is "Tacit knowledge". Currently, IMHO, feel that AI lacks that ability to possess that "Tacit knowledge", in several areas (in specific situations or in several industries). It is too human to hand over to AI
Example:
Lets take an example in substantiating the claim that i made above. As a workplace foundation coach and also an enterprise agile coach, i deal with many individuals and teams. The knowledge and experience that a coach have accrued over a period of time is difficult to be conveyed and replicated in AI in my purview. Especially when dealing with people on coaching, the emotional intelligence is a key aspect. IMHO, therefore it is not easy to train AI models on these aspects however sophisticated they be.
How you might reimagine it to make AI a valuable contributor?
W.r.t examples related to the activities of say coaching/consulting (say Psychologist)/healing following can be useful steps
1. Build Capability/Train on emotional intelligence for the AI systems
2. After capability is built, feed dummy problem statement (similar to the original problem where human beings were used for the activities) for coaching/consulting and check how results are coming out.
3. Compare the human based outcome vs AI generated results/outcome
4. If not satisfactory, then inspect where the gap is and adapt accordingly
In General, wherever 'tacit knowledge' is needed, you may need all these 4 steps. There are many areas in which AI is difficult to be leveraged. But nevertheless, i feel these steps could be by and large common - Build the corresponding capability, test the capability built with a sample data, compare that with existing ecosystem (human driven) and if satisfactory you move to AI based; else then inspect where the gap is and adapt accordingly.
Also please do take a look at Polanyi paradox that gives some additional info on 'tacit knowledge' and 'emotional intelligence' aspect
"https://www.benchmarksixsigma.com/forum/topic/39795-polanyi%E2%80%99s-paradox/"
Conclusion:
IMHO, there are quite a few areas like 'Tacit knowledge' which are difficult to be achieved through AI. In general, any task or decision for which you are (made) accountable, you would want to manually do it and would not rely on AI. This may be due to a psychology fear (That there could be a backlash if things go awry and it stems from the fact that most of the people, do not trust technology especially when they do not have too much grip or understanding on that). Therefore, IMHO, such tasks or decisions belong to this category of too human to handover to AI. So that kind of tasks/decisions are difficult to be reimagined in AI way. Better understanding of AI can increase people's confidence (for instance, where its power lies and where can be pitfalls in its usage - if that can be understand by people). This can help in transforming such manual works to AI based