A critical and important aspect of Project Management is the estimation of the cost and time taken for each activity of the Project. These estimates determine the framework of the project such as the schedule, scope, and cost baseline. The PMI Body of Knowledge uses the 3-point estimate that is part of the PERT, Beta, or Triangular distribution.
Three-Point Estimate
It is used to estimate the activity duration and costs of various activities of a Project. It takes into consideration the optimistic, pessimistic, and most likely estimate of the activity. The estimate is generally given by subject matter experts (SMEs).
The optimistic estimate assumes no hindrances to the activity and is generally the best-case outcome, whereas the pessimistic estimate is the worst-case outcome which assumes the Murphy Law of the possibility of everything going wrong. These estimates are the extremes and need to be realistic. The third estimate is the one that has the most likely outcome and is most realistic. As it would be erroneous to take the mean of the best-case and worst-case scenario to arrive at the most likely case, the opinion of the Subject Matter Expert is important. These three estimates form the triangular distribution and is one of the popular distributions that is used in simulation software such as Oracle Crystal Ball.
Advantages and Disadvantages
The 3-point estimate is easy to use and can be used for small projects where the range between the Optimistic and Pessimistic estimates is narrow. It is simple and does not require too many calculations to arrive at the estimated duration or cost. The disadvantage is that in larger projects with a large number of interdependent activities, any inaccuracy in the estimates is magnified down the line.
PERT
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) is a project management technique that was developed by the United States Navy in the 1950s. It is very similar to the Critical Path Method, however differs in that the CPM uses a single time estimate which is generally accurate. Hence CPM is used for projects which have been done in the past and an accurate time estimate is possible whereas PERT is used in larger projects that are generally executed for the first time and time estimates from past experiences or data are not available. The PERT method takes the 3-point estimate, overweighs the most likely estimate, and transforms the triangular distribution into a normal distribution.
Advantages and Disadvantages
The advantage of PERT is that it is useful when there is little historical data available and helps the project manager to make an informed estimate of the project timelines. It, therefore, is a good tool in project planning and optimal resource utilization and optimization of resources where historical data is not available.
Being subjective in nature it is at times difficult to interpret, update, modify and maintain. The biases and prejudices of the subject matter expert may affect the estimates and hence both the cost and schedule of the project.
Differences between Triangular and PERT Distribution
In a Triangular distribution the expected time period or cost is calculated based on the area under the triangular distribution, whereas in a PERT distribution, the estimated time durations or cost is calculated based on a normal distribution. The properties of a normal distribution are that about 68%, 95.4%, and 99.72% of the data lies between one, two, and three standard deviations respectively.
In the Triangular Distribution the Expected amount of time or cost, is calculated as the mean of the Optimistic, Most Likely, and Pessimistic estimate. In the PERT Beta Distribution, the Expected amount of time or cost, is calculated by giving a weight of 1 to the Optimistic and Pessimistic estimate and a weight of 4 to the Most likely estimate. The Standard Deviation of the PERT Distribution is (Pessimistic – Optimistic)/6.
Considering the shape of the two distributions, the area under the distribution closer to the tails is greater in a 3-point distribution as against a PERT distribution. Similarly, the area under the curve closer to the expected value is greater in a PERT distribution as against a 3-point distribution. Hence a PERT distribution is likely to give a more accurate expected value than a 3-point distribution.
Examples of PERT and 3 Point Estimate
Let us assume the Optimistic estimate to be 10 days, the Most likely estimate to be 14 days and the Pessimistic estimate to be 30 days. The expected duration with a Triangular estimate would be (10+14 + 30)/3 = 18 days, whereas the expected duration with a PERT Distribution would be (10 + 4*14 + 30)/6 = 96/6 = 16 days. The Standard deviation would be (30-10)/6 = 3.33.
PERT is used in larger projects that are generally executed for the first time and time estimates from past experiences or data are not available. It would therefore be used in Projects like landing a man on the Moon or Mars, design and development of electric cars, Augmented Reality, etc. The US Navy first used PERT in the Polaris Submarine Missile Program.
References
https://project-management.info/three-point-estimating-pert/