Q 720. Is it correct to say that most failures in a Tech Product or Tech Tool can be traced back to a flaw in the Business Requirement Document (BRD)? Support your answer with suitable examples. 

 

Note for website visitors -

• This platform hosts two weekly questions, one on Tuesday and the other on Friday. 
• All previous questions can be found here: https://www.benchmarksixsigma.com/forum/lean-six-sigma-business-excellence-questions/. 
• To participate in the current question, please visit the forum homepage at https://www.benchmarksixsigma.com/forum/.
• The question will be open until Tuesday or Friday at 5 PM Indian Standard Time, depending on the launch day. 
• Responses will not be visible until they are reviewed, and only non-plagiarised answers with less than 5-10% plagiarism will be approved. 
• If you are unsure about plagiarism, please check your answer using a plagiarism checker tool such as https://smallseotools.com/plagiarism-checker/ before submitting. 
• All correct answers shall be published, and the top-rated answer will be displayed first. The author will receive an honourable mention in our Business Excellence dictionary at https://www.benchmarksixsigma.com/forum/business-excellence-dictionary-glossary/ along with the related term.

• Some people seem to be using AI platforms to find forum answers. This is a risky approach as AI responses are error-prone because our questions are application-oriented (they are never straightforward). Have a look at this funny example - https://www.benchmarksixsigma.com/forum/topic/39458-using-ai-to-respond-to-forum-questions/

• We also use an AI content detector at https://quillbot.com/ai-content-detector. Only answers with less than 45-50% AI-generated content will be approved.

Failures in tech products or tools are often tied back to issues in the Business Requirement Document (BRD), which is foundational for guiding development. The BRD is meant to capture the business’s goals, user needs, and specific functionalities. When there’s a flaw in this document, it can lead to misunderstandings or misaligned priorities, causing the final product to miss the mark.

 

Here is one example to illustrate this:

1. Lack of Clear Objectives: If a BRD doesn’t clearly define the primary business objectives (e.g., driving user engagement), the development team might focus on features that don’t effectively meet that goal. For instance, a platform aiming to improve customer interaction might end up with complex features that don’t actually enhance engagement, leading to user frustration and low adoption.

While it's true that a significant number of failures in a tech product or tech tool can often be traced back to issues in the Business Requirement Document (BRD), saying "most" might be an overstatement. Various other factors also come into play, including technical execution, project management, user experience design, and unforeseen market dynamics. However, a flawed BRD can certainly set the stage for numerous problems down the line. Here are a few examples to illustrate this point:

1. Scope Creep: If the BRD is not clear and precise, it can lead to scope creep, where additional features or changes are continually added. This can lead to project delays, increased costs, and eventually a product that is either incomplete or overly complex. For instance, if a BRD for a new project management tool does not define the core functionalities clearly, stakeholders might keep requesting new features, diverting focus from the essential requirements.
2. Misaligned Expectations: If the BRD fails to capture the true needs and expectations of the stakeholders, the final product may not meet user needs. For example, a BRD for a customer relationship management (CRM) tool might prioritize data analytics features without adequately addressing the need for seamless integration with existing email systems. This misalignment can leave users frustrated and the product underutilized.
3. Incomplete Requirements: Sometimes, a BRD might not cover all necessary requirements, leading to significant oversights. For instance, if developing an e-commerce platform, omitting a requirement for a robust payment gateway integration can lead to major issues, compromising the platform's ability to facilitate transactions effectively.
4. Unclear Priorities: A BRD that does not clearly define the priority of features and requirements can result in resource allocation issues. For example, if developing a mobile app, not specifying that offline functionality is a higher priority than certain user interface enhancements can lead to a product that looks good but fails crucial user needs for accessibility.
5. Lack of Stakeholder Involvement: A BRD that is developed without sufficient input from all relevant stakeholders can miss key requirements. For instance, developing an internal tool for a financial team without including requirements from compliance officers can result in a tool that fails to meet regulatory standards, leading to potential legal issues.

However, a successful BRD will have to cover the following aspects to be foolproof:

1. Clear Communication: A thorough BRD ensures that all stakeholders—developers, project managers, clients, and business analysts—are on the same page regarding what the project aims to achieve. This minimizes misunderstandings and aligns expectations.
2. Scope Definition: A BRD clearly delineates the scope of the project, detailing what is included and, importantly, what is not. This helps to prevent scope creep and keeps the project focused on achieving its core objectives within the allotted time and budget.
3. Resource Planning: By outlining all the requirements and features, a BRD helps in accurate resource planning. This includes identifying necessary skill sets, tools, and manpower needed to complete the project successfully.
4. Requirement Prioritization: A well-articulated BRD helps in prioritizing requirements based on the needs and goals of the business. This ensures that the most critical features are developed first, providing maximum value to the users and stakeholders.
5. Risk Management: Including detailed requirements and constraints, a BRD helps in identifying potential risks early in the project. This allows for the development of mitigation strategies, ensuring smoother project progression.
6. Benchmark for Success: A BRD provides clear criteria for success, which can be used to measure project progress and performance. This ensures that the final output meets the agreed-upon standards and expectations.
7. Facilitates Testing: A detailed BRD provides a basis for creating test cases and validation criteria. This ensures that all the functionalities are thoroughly tested against the documented requirements, leading to a more reliable and robust final product.

 

In conclusion, while a flawed BRD can lead to numerous issues and potential project failure, a well-crafted BRD significantly increases the chances of project success by providing clear, detailed, and agreed-upon guidelines for all involved parties.

In real life scenarios we witness many such failures in a Tech Product or Tech Tool where root cause can be linked to a flaw in the Business Requirement Document (BRD). BRD is a document that articulates product or tool requirement to solve business problem or improve business performance and this document is taken as a guidebook by supplier to develop Tech product or Tech tool.

 

BRD generally consists of the feature, functionality, performance expectation of the product and also the constraints of the project. Thus, it's clear that any ambiguity or inaccuracy may result in potential failure in product or tool. There can be multiple reasons for this:

 

1. Lack of Articulation: Articulating the exact requirement in BRD is a tough task. Generally, the user has dream Tech product conceptualization in mind but articulating that in exactly the same way can play significant role in success or failure of Tech product or Tech tool. 

Example: Apple's BRD on Maps could not convey the requirement of precise location with accuracy that resulted in significant map errors, improper navigations and low quality satellite images.

 

2. Lack of Prioritization: In many cases people want it all in BRD and give all the possible features in Tech product or Tech tool which may result in lack of prioritization to unique and most valuable features.

Example: Windows Vista is a perfect example for this where BRD listed so many features without clear prioritization on performance focus. Ultimately, it failed due to frequent crashes and compatibility problems and had to be replaced with Windows 7.

 

3. Misinterpretation of Business Needs: In many BRDs specificity is missing which may create misinterpretation. 

Example: If requirement is on support with multiple payment options for e-business application, then developer might miss one of the important integrations (exp-Bit Coin payment option) which may result in loss of potential sales.

 

4. Poor Definition of Success Criteria: This, I believe is the most important reason as Success Criteria for the Tech product or Tool must be defined with respect to performance, quality, durability and cost effectiveness. 

Example: JioChat where despite so many Jio Users the app could not succussed as it was lacking success criteria like target for user adoption, engagement and market spread.

 

Thus, it is important to articulate 360deg angle on Business Requirement in BRD so there is zero misalignment.

Let’s first understand what a BRD is. BRD in short stands for Business Requirement Document. What is the purpose of a BRD? Business Requirement Documents are used extensively to do the groundwork before building a new application. They are used to gather all business requirements and hence it also outlines the objectives and expectations of a project from a business perspective. Now let us see what are the basic components of a BRD? A basic BRD will need to contain some of the below mentioned.,

1.       Project Overview & Objectives

2.       Project Scope & Constraints

3.       High Level Architecture

4.       Stakeholder Identification

5.       Identifying Roles and Responsibilities

6.       Business requirements | Security & Compliance

7.       Defining Success Criteria and KPI’s

8.       Quality control measures

9.       Cost-benefit analysis

All the above if documented correctly will ensure the success of the project. Each component by itself is a key to the project’s success. Next, what is the importance of a BRD? BRD’s ensures that there is alignment on business goals, it ensures that there is clear communication of what needs to be done between the stakeholders and the technical teams, and it also covers the Risk mitigation elements which helps to identify potential challenges and allows for proactive solutioning for the project’s success. So, in-short from a Tech product or a Tech Tool perspective, BRD is the starting point for any software project or business solution design and development.

Now that we understand what a BRD is and what are the components and what is the importance of a BRD for a project, let us address the main question “Is it correct to say that most failures in a Tech Product or Tech Tool can be traced back to a flaw in the Business Requirement Document (BRD)?”

The Answer is YES. Most Tech Product or Tech Tool failures can be traced back to a flaw in the BRD. Sometimes even design and development failures are influence by a BRD to an extent. Let us look at an example’s situation.

1.       Failure Example of Data breach:

                                        Company A developed a product (HIYE – How Is Your Experience) that ensure that all in-patient feedback is collected in an app which will help assess the experience during hospitalization. This Product will collect real time data from the patients, analyse data and deliver insights on experience. These reports will be released to the hospital administration. From this data set hospitals will be able to understand patient sentiments, staff responsiveness, facility rating and other services provided that have influenced the overall satisfaction rating.

What happened: Personal data of patients was exposed due to security breach

Cause of Failure: Inadequate Data Protection Policies and Procedures

Impact on Company A:

Multiple lawsuits levied against them leading to hefty fines leading to huge expenses impacting financials and margin in adding to loss of reputation.

How could have this been avoided: A BRD must clearly state and capture all data protection policies and procedures followed as per the industry standards to ensure that there cannot be a breach of any sort of security or data leakage. All stakeholders must sign off on this and the regulatory boards consent is required before the product is placed on the market. All this can be done during the testing stage itself using ethical hackers to hack into the system and see how strong the product is. From time to time after the product has gone live, the team must ensure that the latest policies and procedures are rolled out based on the evolving statuary standard. ISO standards must be followed.

2.       Failure Example of User Privacy and Data Ethics:

                                        Company A developed a product (HIYE – How Is Your Experience) that ensure that all in-patient feedback is collected in an app which will help assess the experience during hospitalization. This Product will collect real time data from the patients, analyse data and deliver insights on experience. These reports will be released to the hospital administration. From this data set hospitals will be able to understand patient sentiments, staff responsiveness, facility rating and other services provided that have influenced the overall satisfaction rating.

What happened: Company A shared patients’ sensitive data for research to a third-party consultancy

Cause of Failure: Inadequate Data handling practices and failure to obtain user consent

Impact on Company A: Regulatory fines levied | Trust factor impacted and hospitals refused to adopt the app leading to lower customer base and business loss

How could have this been avoided: A BRD must clearly state and capture all data handling practices must maintain user privacy and cannot be used without user consent. Ethical handling and consent mechanism are vital to maintain user trust and comply with laws. GDPR standards must be followed to comply with privacy laws.

How do we ensure that these kinds of failures do not happen. There are some key best practices that we can follow to avoid these major setbacks. They are listed below.,

a.       Clarity & Precision – Use clear language to define technical and compliance terms. Avoid ambiguity and use standard terms that are consistent throughout the document

b.       Stakeholder Management – Ensure a collaborative effort is done in requirement gathering phase. Ensure that the stakeholders needs are balanced, and a regular communication channel is always open to address updates and realignments

c.        Document Organization – A proper hierarchical structure needs to be followed in document organization. Hence structure is key to success. Usage of templates signed off by all parties is a way of standardizing documentation which allows ease of understanding. Usage of visual aids like flowcharts and diagrams should be encouraged.

d.       Documenting Ethical considerations – Explicit ethical requirements need to be captured. Bias mitigation strategies should be employed. Transparency and explain-ability are key to behaviour and decision-making process.

e.       User Privacy and Data Ethics – Data handling practices need to be defined to maintain privacy. Compliance with privacy laws such ad GDPR are mandatory

f.         Governance Framework – Clear governance and accountability structures that define how the company manages user information/content. Policies and Procedures that are essential for data governance and security. Oversight mechanisms to ensure safety and compliance.

g.       Regulatory Compliance – Addressing Legal requirements during planning. Employing compliance strategies for legal and financial sustainability.

h.       Security Requirements – Ensuring strong security standards and protocols (ISO). Threat modelling or having a team work on hacking the system internally that can proactively identify and mitigate security threats. Having an incident response plan that ensures rapid detection to security incidents.

If all the above recommended practices are followed, BRD creation will turn out robust and reduce if not prevent tech product or tech tool failures.

 

BRD is a formal document which outlines the requirements of a project for its success. It provides a roadmap of the project and helps the involved teams to understand the different aspect. For instance, the goals, expectations etc.

 

In my opinion also, many failures in Tech product or tool can be attributed to BRD. Although it may not be the only reason of the failure. Below mentioned are some of the examples:

 

• Incomplete requirement gathering: If BRD does not capture all the requirements or business goals, then the product will not meet the business expectations.
• Inaccurate requirement captured: If incorrect requirements are captured, it would lead to the development of features which are not required.
• Agreeing to requirements which may not be feasible: If BRD captures requirement which are too complex and may not be delivered.
• Failure to involve key stakeholders: If the Key stakeholders are not consulted, then critical functionality might be missed.

                                                                        

Deep has provided the best answer to this question as it covers broader aspects of the question.

 

Michael's answer was a close second as it focusses primarily on security and data breach aspects. However, it is a must read answer.