Pankaj Bansod

Thanks Sir.

Dear Sir, I am in the field of manufacturing of Consumer and Industrial Electronics I want to discuss the point of 100% inspection in the process. Also you have suggested a automated Inspection. This automated inspection seems to be costly in comparison with all other approaches. This automated inspection is mostly used in higher level product like motherboards, Cellphones and other critical applications. Automated inspection is not possible sometimes on the product level. Also 100% manual inspection is very difficult and time consuming (manpower cost also involved) when product is of high volume and low end (small components but in thousands) Please suggest in this case. Thanks & Regards, Pankaj Bansod Customer Quality Engineer Celestica (India) Pvt. Ltd. Hyderabad, India

As per me DFSS and it's methodalogy are the intelligent and sure ways to deploy the FMEA for the process or product. In the most NPI (new product introduction) we used to do FMEA and that time only we get known most of the problems related to our product where we need to re-design and validate it. It is based on the data analysis from the NPI process itself. This NPI time only we will come to know most of the CTQ's. I feel that DFSS gives us the capable process and ways to develop our process so that our product/sevice reach to the customer without fail/safely. I eager to about Kano Analysis, Kansei Engineering. Please reply.. Pankaj B. Hyderabad