Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Benchmark Six Sigma Forum

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Topics

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 11/08/2015 in Posts

  1. Mr. Peterson has over 30 years of experience in the aircraft maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) business. Throughout these assignments, Mr. Peterson has used continuous improvement tools, such as "lean management" and "six sigma," to lead change in processes and organizational culture. Watch his speech on: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tfQiGDUBdD0
  2. Most of us are wrongly taught that robust design (of DFSS) can only be achieved through experimental methods like DOE and Taguchi. It's a time consuming approach and it's been known for a while that it's very limited. What's more, robust design is significantly easier to understand visually and can also be done easily and quickly mathematically by simply looking at an equation. Let's see how. Consider the formula below. It is for the stiffness of a simple helical spring. We want a certain spring rate k. The question we are now faced with is: what values should we select for each of the input variables to minimise the effects of randomness (or have a robust design)? Consider the graph below. Note how when we have a smaller gradient (blue) the variability is compressed, but with a larger gradient (red) it is expanded? Well that's basically robustification: finding the smaller gradient. So now back to the spring. Let's consider each variable and it's gradient: The spring diameter D Increasing the value will quickly reduce the gradient; it is inverse and cubed The wire diameter d Decreasing it will reduce the gradient very quickly because it is quatic The modulus of rigidity G The gradient doesn't change because it is linear The number of coils n Increasing the value decreases the gradient fairly quickly; it is reciprocated Therefore, the easiest way to robustify this design is to: minimise d, maximise D, maximise n and then adjust G to provide the desired k value. Now obviously this is a simple example, and you will probably have something more sophisticated. Nevertheless, what I have explained to you here is enough so that you can now understand the mathematics of how a system is easily robustified. Without costly experiments. Remember, it is all about the gradient. So why don't we know more about these simple and easy probabilistic methods? probably because the quality industry is still dominated by by statistitians who are basically experimentalists. They key is to become familiar with principles of probabilistic design methods and robustification. Once you have, you can intuitively apply these principles. And produce quality designs with ease. If you want to improve your understanding of how probability and mathematics can help you easily improve quality and achieve six sigma, then you can learn more here. You can sign up to a free theory update about probabilistic design, download some free software and get a free sample of of an e-book on probabilistic design. Please let me know if you have any questions about this. I think a lot of people are let down by not being taught this stuff, and I really want to rectify this situation.
This leaderboard is set to Kolkata/GMT+05:30

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.