• Main website
  • Case Studies Home
  • Case Studies
    • Green Belt
      • Example Green Belt Projects-Health Care
      • Example Green Belt Projects-Manufacturing
      • Example Green Belt Projects-Services
    • Black Belt
      • Example Black Belt Projects-Health Care
      • Example Black Belt Projects-Manufacturing
      • Example Black Belt Projects-Services
    • Master Black Belt
    • Lean Success Stories
  • Articles
    • LSS topics of common interest
    • Insights for Green Belts
    • Green Belt tool application examples
    • Insights for Black Belts
    • Black Belt Tool Application Examples
    • Lean Insights
    • Lean Six Sigma Leadership
    • For Master Black Belts
    • New to Lean Six Sigma
      • Lean Expert Basics
      • Six Sigma Basics
    • Leisure and Fun
  • Blog

Lean Six Sigma case study: Fault Reduction in Cable Industry

In the cable industry, measure of defects or faults is decided by visit of the technician to a customer’s home. The most problematic situation for all cable companies is when the problem of the customer cannot be resolved over the phone and a technician visit has to be arranged after a recent new installation.
Cable Company X wanted to track the installation variables which were the most predictive of a truck roll within seven days of a new installation. For this purpose, they did a lean six sigma case study. The four parameters on which Company X tracks for each installation are downstream power, downstream signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), upstream power and upstream SNR.

The lean six sigma case study tells that the company made use of binary logistic regression to determine if there was a statistically noteworthy correlation among the four parameters and the probability of a fault occurring within a week of a new installation.

The logistic regression clearly depicted that only the downstream and upstream SNRs are statistically important. Logistic regression also revealed that the higher the values of SNRs are, the better; however, the ways to increase these values in the field have a cost attached to them. As per the model in question, raising the SNR by only 10 percent for both downstream and upstream can lessen the truck roll probability to 1.08 percent in a period of seven days.

The lean six sigma case study of Company X shows that from its six major markets, the two smallest markets were chosen for this implementation. The mid-range markets aim to do a gradual update to their grids to increase the value of SNR, at which time annualized savings will shoot up considerably.

See full story on isixsigma.com

August 5, 2014   Benchmark Six Sigma
Case Studies, Example Green Belt Projects-Services, Green Belt Qualified, Master Black Belt
×

  • Lean Six Sigma for the Digital Analyst | Analytics & Optimization
  • How Toyota brought its famed manufacturing method (Kaizen) to India

Leave a Reply

Cancel

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Categories

  • Articles
    • Black Belt Tool Application Examples
    • For Master Black Belts
    • Green Belt tool application examples
    • Insights for Black Belts
    • Insights for Green Belts
    • Lean Insights
    • Lean Six Sigma Leadership
    • Leisure and Fun
    • LSS topics of common interest
    • New to Lean Six Sigma
      • Lean Expert Basics
      • Six Sigma Basics
  • Case Studies
    • Black Belt Qualified
      • Example Black Belt Projects-Health Care
      • Example Black Belt Projects-Manufacturing
      • Example Black Belt Projects-Services
    • Green Belt Qualified
      • Example Green Belt Projects-Health Care
      • Example Green Belt Projects-Manufacturing
      • Example Green Belt Projects-Services
    • Master Black Belt
  • Featured Articles
  • Lean Qualified
    • Lean Success Stories
  • Project Management Articles
  • Uncategorized

Archives

  • April 2021
  • November 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • February 2012
  • March 2011
Copyright © 2022 Benchmark Six Sigma