Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'error proofing'.



More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Learning Business Excellence and Lean Six Sigma
    • Join as an Excellence Ambassador
    • Debate : For or Against
    • Work Area for Business Excellence Glossary/ Dictionary
    • Lean Six Sigma for Beginners
    • Lean Six Sigma applicability in Industry Sectors
    • Discussion Forum for Practitioners
  • Know about Benchmark Six Sigma
    • How is Benchmark different?
    • Testimonials
    • Recreation Center
  • Discussions related to Training
    • Discussions related to Green Belt, Black Belt, Lean Expert
    • Right Sequence for Training and Projects
    • Master Black Belt and its competencies
    • Refresh your basics on data analysis
  • Benchmark Six Sigma Participants Support Forum
  • Articles from across the Globe

Categories

  • Process Excellence
  • Data Driven Decision Making
  • Debate

Blogs

There are no results to display.

There are no results to display.

Categories

  • Participants Support- General
  • Open Forum- General
  • Basic Maths for Six Sigma
  • Training Brochures
  • Black Belt Pre-Study Material & Exercise Content
  • Green Belt Pre-Study Material & Exercise Content

Calendars

There are no results to display.

There are no results to display.


Found 1 result

  1. Q11. While it is understood that mistake proofing is immensely effective, there is some confusion about what it means or intends to achieve. Let us look at the following interpretations of Poka Yoke - The human error will not happen at all. Human error may continue to happen but the defect will not happen. Human error may happen, the defect is less likely to happen. Human error may happen, the defect will also happen but will be detected and corrected automatically. Which of the above interpretations are correct? Please explain with valid examples.
×